Frankenstein. However, once I actually
read Frankenstein, I realized that not only was I mistaken of Frankenstein's
identity, but also about millions of other people out there. In actuality,
everyone's wrongly naming this nameless monster as Frankenstein. So, how did
this grand identification go on for so long? Now, I cannot even fathom in the
future someone calling themselves "Frankenstein" without me saying
"Well, you know Frankenstein was actuality the creator of the monster that
you call yourself". This myriad of wrong ideas about the Frankenstein
story is probably a conglomeration of bad plays and movies. It is amazing too
me that more people don't know who Frankenstein actually is. The classic
fictional story is about as popular and overdone as Cinderella
I
used to think of Frankenstein as a brain dead, zombie like creature but I
totally disagree now that I have finished the book. In a way, Frankenstein is
almost more human than his creator in his sensitivities. He has an appreciation
for nature and the living things around him despite the lack of parallel that
can be drawn between the natural realm and the artificial that he has been
brought up into. He desires the same consumption of knowledge as fulfillment as
his creator Victor. This could be noticed especially when he watched from afar,
the practices of the DeLacey family. He wishes to learn the language of humans
adn mimic their behaviours. Furthermore, he recognizes that Victor is his
creator and supposed to be a father figure like that you would find in
traditional human family roles. When Victor doesn't fulfill this role at all,
the monster is left degenerate with the same feeling of rejection as an orphan
who is mature enough to realize that they have been given up by their parents.
Especially, in a world that feels so much to not be his own, he just wishes for
connection to someone or something.
As much as people think they know Frankenstein, it has become one of the
most commonly mistaken characters of all time. Nevertheless, I find it very very ironic that
throughout the progression of the novel, the creature finds himself
without an identity and yet throughout pop culture the character has been given
the erroneous identity of his hated creator. It almost further elaborates upon
Shelley's emphasis on the duality of their characters and their essence of the
same being.
No comments:
Post a Comment